Eugenie Scott
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70fd4/70fd48d486b95fe139204bb183f04537c0806a57" alt="Eugenie Scott"
Eugenie Scott
Eugenie Carol Scottis an American physical anthropologist, a former university professor and one of the strongest voices challenging the teaching of young earth creationism and intelligent design in schools. From 1987 to 2013, Scott served as the Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc., a pro-evolution nonprofit science education organization with members in every state. She holds a Ph.D. in Biological Anthropology from the University of Missouri. A human biologist, her research has been in medical anthropology...
avoid legal slip teach trying
This is neo-creationism, trying to avoid the legal morass of trying to teach creationism overtly and slip it in through the backdoor.
fairness positively react
Americans react very positively to the fairness or equal-time kind of argument.
effort goes ignore information less means presenting result science students teacher teachers
Essentially what goes on in these seminars is an effort to tell students they should ignore or deprecate the information the teacher is presenting to them. As a result teachers may teach less evolution, which means we have less science literacy.
dead design difficult district future legal mean popular school social strategy survive
As a legal strategy intelligent design is dead. It will be very difficult for any school district in the future to successfully survive a legal challenge. That doesn't mean intelligent design is dead as a very popular social movement. This is an idea that has got legs.
hoping lessons rest sign throughout
Lawsuits, from my standpoint, are a sign of failure. We're hoping the lessons of Dover can be communicated throughout the rest of the country.
complexity good reason research using
But no one is using irreducible complexity as a research strategy, and with very good reason ... because it's completely fruitless.
god itself key natural people saying science therefore understanding
This is actually, I think, key to understanding this whole controversy in this country: people think that because science restricts itself to a natural cause, it's therefore saying that God had nothing to do with it.
anticipate fighting gets kansas science stakes standards state
The stakes are high. If Kansas gets away with it ... I anticipate that in every state where science standards are up for revision, we are going to be fighting another battle.
religious believe love-you
People don't show up here (at the courtroom) because they believe evolution is bad science. They show up because they believe that if they accept evolution, then they are abandoning their religious beliefs. They see it as an either/or proposition: Either evolution happened, or God loves you.
religious school ideas
Creationists who want religious ideas taught as scientific fact in public schools continue to adapt to courtroom defeats by hiding their true aims under ever changing guises.
fields spheres evolution
Evolution is not controversial in the field of science. It's controversial in the public sphere because public education is highly politicized.
students evolution biology
Evolution makes biology make sense. And if you don't teach your students the evolutionary core of biology, you're making it harder for them.
destroy open science
This would, of course, not open up science but destroy it.
arguing argument evolution phrase pretend ringing scientists students taking took whether
When they say 'teach the controversy' their ringing phrase they want us to pretend to students that scientists are arguing whether evolution took place. This argument is not taking place.