James Gattuso
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d67/39d675803b3453ae7075a0116e3a389ae45953cc" alt="James Gattuso"
James Gattuso
James Leslie Gattusois a senior research fellow for the Roe Institute for Economic Policy Studies at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank based in Washington D.C. He specializes in regulatory issues and telecommunications policy. Gattuso has contributed articles to many publications including The Wall Street Journal, USA Today and The Washington Times...
afford argument assume basic box cable cannot certainly few hundred less looked looking million number people sake satellite smaller table target television third
If you wanted to target the people actually in need, and assume for the sake of argument that there's a need for television, that it's a basic necessity, if you looked only at the people who don't have cable or satellite today, and looked only at the first television in the household, and not the third or the fourth, and looked at only those people who cannot afford a converter box of their own, you would be looking at a few hundred million dollars, certainly less than $500 million. That's a much, much smaller number than we have on the table now.
advantage cost difference economies limit number pool scale
The difference is that there's really not a cost advantage or economies of scale that limit the number of providers. So they're just in the pool with everyone else now.
analog call calls entirely industry method might period phone replace
This is why the Internet-phone industry is probably going to replace entirely what we might call loosely the analog method of phone calls over a period of years.
billions concerned congress deficit dollars finding keeping low morning reducing saving sometime sports taxes waking
Congress was more concerned about constituents waking up in the morning sometime in 2009 and finding out that their televisions didn't work, and they couldn't get the sports show that they wanted. They were more concerned about that than they were about reducing the deficit or keeping taxes low or saving billions of dollars for the taxpayers.