Jonathan Turley
![Jonathan Turley](/assets/img/authors/jonathan-turley.jpg)
Jonathan Turley
Jonathan Turleyis an American lawyer, legal scholar, writer, commentator, and legal analyst in broadcast and print journalism. He is currently a professor of law at The George Washington University Law School...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionLawyer
Date of Birth6 May 1961
CountryUnited States of America
clearly crime crimes fact federal heart high law operation ordered perfectly personally president purpose renewed satisfy standard
The fact is, the federal law is perfectly clear. At the heart of this operation was a federal crime. The president has already conceded that he personally ordered that crime and renewed that order at least 30 times. This would clearly satisfy the standard of high crimes and misdemeanors for the purpose of an impeachment.
highest judicial points
The highest points I give Rehnquist is for his sense of long-term judicial strategy,
crises faced serious
This is one of the most serious constitutional crises that we've ever faced in the country.
barack both change george happened icon issue quiet refreshing supported
I supported Barack Obama. I wasn't very quiet about my support. I thought he was going to be a refreshing change to George Bush. But what has happened is that we have an election that's become a single-issue election, and that issue is Barack Obama. And he's an icon to both sides.
anna bad case dozen fight former good law mother nicole smith son surprising
It's not particularly surprising that a fight between a former stripper and a millionaire's son is good copy. What is surprising is that this case is going to end up in a dozen casebooks and that Anna Nicole Smith will become the mother of probate law for many generations to come. That's not bad for a stripper.
doctrine example federal issue separation textbook type violation
This type of violation should be a textbook example of an impeachment issue because not only is it a federal crime, but it violates the doctrine of separation of powers.
column days describing driven few obama people president saw though truth voted warning wrote
Truth be known, President Obama has never been particularly driven by principle. Right after his election, I wrote a column in a few days warning people that even though I voted for Obama, he was not what people were describing him to be. I saw him in the Senate. I saw him in Chicago.
swings vote ifs
There's no question that Roberts will vote like William Rehnquist... If he swings, it will be from right to far right.
ironic court statutes
It's highly ironic that it was the conservatives on the court who overturned so many statutes.
case ordered president
What the president ordered in this case was a crime.