Timothy Geithner

Timothy Geithner
Timothy Franz "Tim" Geithneris a former American central banker who served as the 75th United States Secretary of the Treasury under President Barack Obama from 2009 to 2013. He was the President of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2003 to 2009, following service in the Clinton administration. He now serves as president of Warburg Pincus, a Wall Street private equity firm...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionEconomist
Date of Birth18 August 1961
CityBrooklyn, NY
CountryUnited States of America
And if all else were equal ... monetary policy in the affected countries would have to adjust in response: policy would have to act to offset these effects in order to achieve the same impact on the future path of demand and inflation.
When policy-makers have already witnessed a significant move in asset values, and are confident in what that move means for the outlook, it should be prepared to adjust policy accordingly. The central bank must be responding to its assessment of what an already observed movement in asset prices will mean for output and inflation.
Most consequential choices involve shades of gray, and some fog is often useful in getting things done
The choice is between which mistake is easier to correct: underdoing it or overdoing it.
If you don't try to generate more revenues through tax reform, if you don't ask, you know, the most fortunate Americans to bear a slightly larger burden of the privilege of being an American, then you have to - the only way to achieve fiscal sustainability is through unacceptably deep cuts in benefits for middle class seniors, or unacceptably deep cuts in national security.
Hyperinflation is not going to happen in this country, will never happen... The Fed putting so much money into the system is not going to create the risk of hyperinflation in the future. We have a strong independent Federal Reserve with a very strong mandate from the Congress, and they will do what's necessary to keep inflation low and stable over time.
We believe in a strong dollar ... Chinese financial assets are very safe.
We have parts of our system which are overwhelmed by regulation. It wasn't the absence of regulation that was the problem. It was despite the presence of regulation you got huge risks built up.
I believe deeply that it's very important to the United States, to the economic health of the United States, that we maintain a strong dollar.
The plausible outcomes range from the gradual and benign to the more precipitous and damaging.
The rest of the world needs the US economy and financial system to recover in order for it to revive. We remain at the center of global economic activity with financial and trade ties to every region of the globe.
The government can help, but we need to make this transition now to a recovery led by private investment, private.
Monetary policy itself cannot sensibly be directed at reducing imbalances.
In the financial system we have today, with less risk concentrated in banks, the probability of systemic financial crises may be lower than in traditional bank-centered financial systems