Trofim Lysenko
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5df46/5df46f837d32b554d938ea047cbf018b76fff41e" alt="Trofim Lysenko"
Trofim Lysenko
Trofim Denisovich Lysenkothe son of Denis and Oksana Lysenko, was born into a peasant family in Karlivka, Poltava Governorateon September 29, 1898. He later attended the Kiev Agricultural Institute, where he found himself interested in agriculture. Here he worked on a few different projects, one involving the effects of temperature variation on the life-cycle of plants. This later led him to consider how he might use this work to convert winter wheat into spring wheat. This process became known as...
NationalityRussian
ProfessionScientist
Date of Birth29 September 1898
CountryRussian Federation
And the more profoundly the science of biology reveals the laws of the life and development of living bodies, the more effective is the science of agronomy.
Even when Darwin's teaching first made its appearance, it became clear at once that its scientific, materialist core, its teaching concerning the evolution of living nature, was antagonistic to the idealism that reigned in biology.
The classics of Marxism, while fully appreciating the significance of the Darwinian theory, pointed out the errors of which Darwin was guilty. Darwin's theory, though unquestionably materialist in its main features, is not free from some serious errors.
Progressively thinking biologists, both in our country and abroad, saw in Darwinism the only right road to the further development of scientific biology.
Darwin himself, in his day, was unable to fight free of the theoretical errors of which he was guilty. It was the classics of Marxism that revealed those errors and pointed them out.
Agricultural practice served Darwin as the material basis for the elaboration of his theory of Evolution, which explained the natural causation of the adaptation we see in the structure of the organic world. That was a great advance in the knowledge of living nature.
Darwinism as presented by Darwin contradicted idealistic philosophy, and this contradiction grew deeper with the development of its materialist teaching.
A major fault, for example, is the fact that, along with the materialist principle, Darwin introduced into his theory of evolution reactionary Malthusian ideas.
Darwin himself recorded the fact that he accepted the Malthusian idea.
Darwin investigated the numerous facts obtained by naturalists in living nature and analysed them through the prism of practical experience.
In the present epoch of struggle between two worlds the two opposing and antagonistic trends penetrating the foundations of nearly all branches of biology are particularly sharply defined.