Bernard Haisch
Bernard Haisch
Bernard Haisch is a German-born American astrophysicist who has done research in solar-stellar astrophysics and stochastic electrodynamics. He has developed with Alfonso Rueda a speculative theory that the non-zero lowest energy state of the vacuum, as predicted by quantum mechanics, might provide a physical explanation for the origin of inertia, and might someday be used for spacecraft propulsion. Haisch has advocated the serious scientific study of phenomena outside the traditional scope of science and is known for his interest in...
Bernard Haisch quotes about
spiritual hate believe
I offer a genuine insight into how you can, and should, be a rational, science-believing human being and at the same time know that you are also an immortal spiritual being, a spark of God. I propose a worldview that offers a way out of the hate and fear-driven violence engulfing the planet.
developers hoping outside
We're hoping outside developers will come in and give it capabilities we hadn't even thought about ourselves.
create credible hope information largest next several
We hope to create the world's largest repository of credible information over the next several years, if not decades.
reading games satisfying
Playing the game is far more satisfying than reading the rules.
reality consciousness
Consciousness creates reality.
looks scientist ufo
Most scientists never look at UFO evidence, which leads to their conclusion that there is no evidence...
science discovery answers
Advances are Made by Answering Questions. Discoveries are Made by Questioning Answers.
reading order done
A 1977 poll of American astronomers, published in JSE, showed the following. Out of 2611 questionnaires 1356 were returned. In response to whether the UFO problem deserved further study the replies were: 23% certainly, 30% probably, 27% percent possibly, 17% probably not, 3% certainly not. Interestingly, there was a positive correlation between the amount of reading done on the subject and the opinion that further study was in order...
cutting examination information
Cut through the ridicule and search for factual information in most of the skeptical commentary and one is usually left with nothing. This is not surprising. After all, how can one rationally object to a call for scientific examination of evidence? Be skeptical of the skeptics.
unique editors vantage-point
It seems from my unique vantage point as both scientist and editor of JSE that substantial evidence exists of "something going on".