Casey Luskin
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d67/39d675803b3453ae7075a0116e3a389ae45953cc" alt="Casey Luskin"
Casey Luskin
The Center for Science and Culture, formerly known as the Center for the Renewal of Science and Culture, is part of the Discovery Institute, a conservative Christian think tank in the United States. The CSC lobbies for the inclusion of creationism in the form of intelligent designin public school science curricula as an explanation for the origins of life and the universe while casting doubt on the theory of evolution. These positions have been rejected by the scientific community, which...
across advisory board bully challenges committee created darwinian education evidence included including learn lesson lobbyists ohio plan presents pulling science scientific scientists simply state strength students trying
Darwin-only lobbyists are trying to bully the Ohio State Board of Education into pulling a lesson plan that was created by a science advisory committee that included teachers, science educators, and scientists from across the state simply because it presents some of the scientific evidence that challenges Darwinian evolution. Students should learn more about evolution, not less, including the theory's strength and weaknesses.
banning clearly design evidence learning merely ohio relevance ruling students teaching
The ruling in Dover banning intelligent design clearly has no relevance for Ohio. Ohio is not teaching intelligent design, making this a completely different issue. That was merely a ploy for Darwinists to keep students from learning about the evidence challenging Darwin's theory.
falsely learn less students
Students will learn more about evolution, not less as some Darwinists have falsely claimed.
courts debate decision design determined evidence larger minor pointing repeatedly scientific ultimate
In the larger debate over intelligent design, this decision will be of minor significance. As we've repeatedly stressed, the ultimate validity of intelligent design will be determined not by the courts but by the scientific evidence pointing to design.