David Bowie
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca3d3/ca3d3fbed6003764ab3323e41c2edd7c72b8e6cc" alt="David Bowie"
David Bowie
David Robert Jones, better known by his stage name David Bowie, was an English singer, songwriter and actor. He was a figure in popular music for over five decades, regarded by critics and musicians as an innovator, particularly for his work in the 1970s. His career was marked by reinvention and visual presentation, his music and stagecraft significantly influencing popular music. During his lifetime, his record sales, estimated at 140 million worldwide, made him one of the world's best-selling music...
NationalityEnglish
ProfessionRock Singer
Date of Birth8 January 1947
CityLondon, England
I'm quite certain that the audience that I've got for my stuff don't listen to the lyrics.
I'm wary of the word glam because I think that became the all-inclusive term with for any bloke with lipstick on, which is fine, you know, and that's what it is when it comes down to the public level.
I'm regarded quite asexually by a lot of people. And the people that understand me the best are nearer to what I understand about me.
The people who don't know so much about me regard me more sexually.
The media is either our salvation or our death.
TV has eaten up everything else, and Warhol films are all that are left, which is fabulous. Pork could become the next I Love Lucy, the great American domestic comedy. It's about how people really live, not like Lucy, who never touched dishwater. It's about people living and hustling to survive.
Some of us, I think, us small, pompous arty ones probably read too much George Steiner and kind of got the idea that we were entering to this kind of post-culture age and that we'd better do something postmodernist - quickly, before somebody else did.
I didn't say that wearing a glamorization of the rock artist was any truer from the other thing.
It would be positively boring if minds were in tune.
The younger people get into the lyrics in a different way; there's much more of a tactile understanding, which is the way I prefer it.
A song has to take on character, shape, body and influence people to an extent that they use it for their own devices. It must affect them not just as a song, but as a lifestyle. The rock stars have assimilated all kinds of philosophies, styles, histories, writings, and they throw out what they have gleaned from that.
I'm rather kind of old school, thinking that when an artist does his work it's no longer his.
You should turn around at the end of the day and say I really like that piece of work, or that piece of work sucked. Not, was that popular or wasn't it popular?
Songwriting as an art is a bit archaic now. Just writing a song is not good enough.