David Kendall
David Kendall
bring closure finally four hopeful million private testimony
We are hopeful that the president's testimony will finally bring closure to the independent counsel's more than four year, over $40 million investigation, which has culminated in an investigation of the president's private life,
department hardly issues justice view
In view of the many issues the Department of Justice must resolve, today's announcement is hardly surprising.
clear complete conclusion department necessary thorough time whatever
It's important for the department to take whatever time is necessary to complete a thorough investigation. At the conclusion of such an inquiry, however, it will be clear that there are no grounds for the appointment of an independent counsel.
absolutely assaulted beyond false president
Any allegation that the president assaulted Mrs. Broaddrick more than 20 years ago is absolutely false ... beyond that we're not going to comment,
article evidence justice obstruct president removal shows
The evidence plainly shows that the president did not obstruct justice in any way and there is nothing in this article (of impeachment) that would warrant his removal from office,
accurate assert both claim counsel fit himself indictment judge public relations seen somehow statements tried wholly
The Independent Counsel has sought, again, to prosecute Ms. McDougal, and this indictment will now be tried to a jury. Independent Counsel Starr, through his public relations officer, has seen fit to assert that the president, by his public statements, has somehow improperly 'injected' himself into the investigation of Ms. McDougal. This claim is wholly false. The president's statements have been both accurate and appropriate. Ms. McDougal has at all times been represented by her own counsel. It is for the public to judge what the Independent Counsel's motivations may be.
criminal department fairness false few guidelines justice leak leaking past rules seen turns ultimately weeks
The leaking of the past few weeks is untolerably unfair. It violates not only the criminal rules -- rules of court, rules of ethics, and Department of Justice guidelines -- it also violates fundamental rules of fairness in an investigation like this. We have seen leak after leak which ultimately ... turns out to be false information,
clearly court dispute
This recommendation is wrong, and clearly contradicted by the president. We will dispute it in a court of law.
felt jordan lewinsky particular plain powerful pressure time
Mr. Jordan testified unequivocally that he never at any time felt any particular pressure to get Ms. Lewinsky a job. This is plain and powerful and unrebutted testimony,
Question: And did you tell them you didn't want to do that? Yes.
We want to know about that day, we really want to know about that day.
ask bipartisan change country events last political sanity stability trial welcome
I think that the bipartisan manner, however, you've conducted this impeachment trial is a welcome change from the events of the last year, ... We ask only that you give this case, and give this country, the constitutional stability and the political sanity which this country deserves.