John Marshall
John Marshall
John Marshallwas the fourth Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. His court opinions helped lay the basis for United States constitutional law and many say made the Supreme Court of the United States a coequal branch of government along with the legislative and executive branches. Previously, Marshall had been a leader of the Federalist Party in Virginia and served in the United States House of Representatives from 1799 to 1800. He was Secretary of State under...
NationalityAmerican
ProfessionJudge
Date of Birth24 September 1755
CountryUnited States of America
The government of the Union, then, ... is, emphatically, and truly, a government of the people. In form and in substance it emanates from them. Its powers are granted by them, and are to be exercised directly on them, and for their benefit.
An unlimited power to tax involves, necessarily, a power to destroy; because there is a limit beyond which no institution and no property can bear taxation.
The people made the Constitution, and the people can unmake it. It is the creature of their own will, and lives only by their will.
The power to tax is the power to destroy.
If you'd ask most defensive coaches, they would say you need to take the run away.
If you're just counting the stats that's probably accurate. But he's had a good year. He's a tone-setter.
Julio does a little more of his talking on the field and with the ball, but they've both helped lead.
We talk about ourselves and how we match up against these guys and playing our defense the way it's designed to be played. There are two components, pass rush and coverage, and you don't play scared or cautious but you play smart.
He was the best fit for C-J. He knows Catholic education. He knows football and he'll embrace the traditions of C-J.
He'd rather be home. The people at St. Mary's are wonderful, but he'd rather be home. He has a driver.
I told him, 'I'm not going to allow you to be the cause of (stroke) number three.
But in view of the constitution, in the eye of the law, there is in this country no superior, dominant, ruling class of citizens. There is no caste here.
The Constitution is not a panacea for every blot upon the public welfare. Nor should this Court, ordained as a judicial body, be thought of as a general haven for reform movements.
The law regards man as man, and takes no account of his surroundings or of his color when his civil rights as guaranteed by the supreme law of the land are involved.