Mark Geragos
Mark Geragos
Mark John Geragosis an Armenian-American criminal defense lawyer. Clients that he has represented include Michael Jackson, actress Winona Ryder, politician Gary Condit, Susan McDougal and Scott Peterson. He was also involved in the Whitewater controversy. Geragos represented suspended NASCAR driver Jeremy Mayfield; Paul and Kulbir Dhaliwal, two brothers injured after a tiger escaped in San Francisco Zoo; and musician Chris Brown, who pleaded guilty in the assault of his then girlfriend Rihanna. In addition, he assisted the family of David...
ProfessionLawyer
Date of Birth5 October 1957
CityLos Angeles, CA
I don't see any reason in the world not to cooperate at this point, because I think this is going to exonerate him. And that's what he's looking for.
That is devastating, in terms of why they've arrested him so quickly,
It's like seeing a poster of some sort of monster,
And that continued through the time that you worked?
The police orchestrated a press conference starring Amber Frey (Peterson's admitted lover) that was carried live on television in January, almost four full months before Scott was even arrested let alone arraigned in this matter. Before the current defense team was in place, Modesto police had held at least six televised press conferences.
It's nothing more than just piling on. It's shameful ... It makes me angry, both as her lawyer and an American.
It was as smooth and performed as well as could be under the circumstances.
It's something so offensive for them to say with a straight face they wanted to look to see if they could clear the president. How dumb do they think we are?
Nancy Luque told me that if she sees an opening to put Starr on trial, she'll call Starr as her first witness and Susan McDougal right behind him.
Michael and I agreed that expanding the team would best serve his interests as we work toward his acquittal on the false charges that have been leveled against him.
I think the world of him. He's a very accomplished attorney.
I don't care if you hate Scott Peterson,
fails to set forth one scintilla of evidence demonstrating that the speech it seeks to restrain creates a clear and present danger or serious and imminent threat to a protected cognizable interest.