Terry Savage
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/39d67/39d675803b3453ae7075a0116e3a389ae45953cc" alt="Terry Savage"
Terry Savage
buy create definition desire economic emotional equally government invest money outside people politics suffer tax tough
But only 'rich' people by definition have the 'extra' money to buy things and invest to create economic growth. Do we really want to tax that 'extra' money away - and give it to the government to spend? Does that make any economic sense outside of politics and our emotional desire to make everyone suffer equally through these tough times?
business directly either grow hire means rich stock
If a rich person invests in a business, either directly or through stock purchases, it means business can grow and hire more people.
burn car certainly cutting driving economic foot increasing likely middle parts result taxes vital
Driving with one foot on the accelerator and the other on the brake is likely to get you nowhere, but certainly will burn out vital parts of your car. Similarly, cutting taxes on the middle class, but increasing them on the 'rich' is likely to result in an economic burnout.
bet earnings economy good government help increasing money oppose rates rather reason round spent tax wealthy
The real reason to oppose increasing tax rates on the wealthy is that it's a good bet they could do more to help the economy if they keep their money rather than have their earnings confiscated by the government and spent on another round of stimulus.