Thomas Vinje
Thomas Vinje
case microsoft property trying turn
Microsoft are trying to turn this into an intellectual property case when it's not.
case clear hope judge lose microsoft property rights strategy
Microsoft only started mentioning intellectual property rights once it was clear it would lose the case two years ago. It's an after-the-facts strategy and I hope the judge will see it for what it is.
abuse case dominant information microsoft property provide refusing trying turn
Microsoft is trying to turn this into an intellectual property case when it's not...This is a case about abuse of a dominant position, about refusing to provide information to vendors.
against case closure commission eu expect proceed result
Any such settlement should not result in the closure of the EU (Microsoft) case. The Commission should, and we expect it will, proceed vigorously with its case against Microsoft,
behavior case commission decide engaged exactly found illegal imposing lesson microsoft occur predicted result taking
In other words, exactly what the commission predicted would occur as a result of Microsoft's illegal bundling behavior has occurred: Real has been marginalized, ... The lesson is that the commission is right to have found Microsoft to have engaged in illegal conduct, but that it erred in taking so long to decide the case and in imposing an ineffective remedy.
against attention case commission comply divert entirely extremely failure microsoft public relations strong
It's merely, entirely and completely a public relations ploy to try to divert attention from the extremely strong case the commission has against Microsoft for failure to comply with the commission's decision.
bought case danger far license rendered ruling side stake technical
The meaningfulness of the 2004 ruling is at stake here. So far no one has bought a license to see Microsoft's technical documentation. There is a danger that this side of the case could be rendered meaningless.
bound commission defend fact given microsoft private since therefore urges
Microsoft has not given up its exclusionary policies...Indeed any settlement in fact validates the Commission's case. Since the Commission is not bound by any private settlement, ECIS therefore urges the Commission to vigorously defend its 2004 Decision.
commission games microsoft playing time
Microsoft has been playing games with the Commission from the beginning, but now it realizes its time is up.
behavior benefits clearly competition engaging microsoft outweigh repeatedly
Microsoft is repeatedly engaging in clearly illegal, anti-competitive behavior because the benefits of extinguishing competition clearly outweigh the costs.
avoid decision delay effective meaning merely microsoft trying until
Microsoft is merely trying to delay the proceedings and to avoid effective implementation of the commission's decision until it has no meaning at all.
continuing court decision legal market media microsoft player practices precedent prevent provides validated vital
Market developments have validated the Commission's concerns. It is vital that the court confirms the Media Player decision because it provides a legal precedent that could be used to prevent Microsoft continuing its abusive bundling practices in future.
allow commission decision
The credibility of the Commission is at stake, and the meaningfulness of the decision is at stake, so I don't think the Commission is going to allow delay.
freedom microsoft talking
What Microsoft is talking about is freedom for them to innovate, not others.